Price

Daily adjusted close · last point is delayed last sale · drag the brush to zoom

1D+0.8%
1W+0.1%
1M+9.1%
3M+1.8%
6M-18.5%
YTD-26.9%
1Y-31.6%
2Y+79.9%
Statusinvestigate
Researchprimary verified
Market cap$26.13B
Updated8/21/2026
Revenue (qtr)$720.8M
FCF (qtr)$-164.6M
Capex (qtr)$17.3M
Net debt—

Summary

Research status: Primary-source verified through Q3 FY2026. Valuation basis: approximately $41.7 in late August 2026; refresh before any capital decision.

Symbotic is one of the clearest public-market expressions of physical AI in logistics: autonomous case-handling robots, AI/software orchestration, high-density storage and system integration for large distribution centers. Q3 FY2026 revenue reached $721M, +22% YoY; net income was $55M versus a $21M loss a year earlier; adjusted EBITDA reached $95M, more than double the prior-year quarter; and cash/cash equivalents were about $1.7B. The company has moved from a pure deployment-growth story toward a model where software, installed-base economics and repeatable system execution could create substantial operating leverage.

The major offset is concentration and execution risk. Walmart remains economically central to the installed base and deployment pipeline, system rollouts are large and complex, reported revenue can be lumpy, and expansion into new customers/use cases must prove the platform is broader than one anchor relationship.

PowerFund 24-month scenario framework: Bear 30% = $28; Base 50% = $55; Bull 20% = $90; probability-weighted value about $53.9, or ~13.7% annualized from the reference price. 60-month framework: Bear 25% = $25; Base 50% = $85; Bull 25% = $160; weighted value about $88.8, or ~16.3% annualized. These are PowerFund scenarios, not company guidance or analyst targets.

Thesis

Investment case

Symbotic can become a scaled operating system for high-throughput warehouses if its robotics/software platform proves transferable across retail, wholesale, food distribution and third-party logistics. The economic proposition is powerful: higher storage density, faster case movement, reduced labor intensity, improved inventory accuracy and 24/7 throughput. Because the software layer coordinates a fleet of robots and warehouse logic, successful deployments can create switching costs beyond the hardware itself.

The thesis is investable if (1) deployments continue to ramp on time and with improving gross/EBITDA economics, (2) non-Walmart customers become a larger share of backlog/revenue, (3) software and service economics rise as the installed base grows, and (4) the company can convert accounting earnings into durable free cash flow without requiring structurally rising deployment capital.

Verified operating baseline

  • Q3 FY2026 revenue: $721M, +22% YoY.
  • Net income: $55M versus a $21M loss in Q3 FY2025.
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $95M versus $45M a year earlier.
  • Cash and cash equivalents: approximately $1.7B at quarter-end.
  • Symbotic describes its platform as end-to-end AI-enabled robotics and software for supply-chain automation.
  • FY2025 10-K and FY2026 10-Q continue to show a business with material customer concentration and significant contract/deployment accounting complexity.

Valuation scenarios

24 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied value
Bear30%Slower deployments, concentration persists, margins stall$28
Base50%15–20% revenue growth, EBITDA margin expands, customer mix broadens$55
Bull20%Strong multi-customer adoption and software-like operating leverage$90

Weighted value: ~$53.9.

60 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied value
Bear25%Platform remains concentrated/project-heavy$25
Base50%Broader logistics platform with recurring software/service layer$85
Bull25%Category-leading warehouse automation OS with strong FCF conversion$160

Weighted value: ~$88.8.

Catalysts

  • Additional large non-Walmart customer wins that materially diversify backlog.
  • Faster deployment cadence with stable or improving project margins.
  • Rising software/service contribution as installed systems mature.
  • Evidence that GreenBox/other commercialization structures create attractive recurring economics rather than financing burden.
  • Continued adjusted EBITDA expansion and conversion to positive free cash flow.
  • Expansion into grocery, wholesale and other high-throughput verticals.
  • Successful integration of acquired software/optimization capabilities.

Risks

  • Customer concentration: Walmart remains a dominant economic relationship; any slowdown, renegotiation or insourcing would be material.
  • Project execution: large warehouse deployments carry schedule, commissioning, cost-overrun and acceptance risk.
  • Accounting complexity: long-duration contracts, milestone recognition and related-party structures can make headline growth less informative than cash economics.
  • Capital intensity: robotics hardware and deployment working capital can absorb cash even as EBITDA rises.
  • Competition: AutoStore, Ocado, Exotec, Dematic, Swisslog, Honeywell and internal customer automation teams compete across different layers.
  • Technology risk: rapidly improving computer vision, mobile robotics and general-purpose humanoid/robot platforms could change system economics.
  • Valuation volatility: the stock can re-rate sharply on deployment timing or customer news.
  • Governance/related-party complexity: founder control and strategic customer relationships require extra scrutiny.

Invalidation

WARNING / FREEZE ADDITIONS

  • Revenue growth falls below ~10% for two quarters without a clearly temporary deployment-timing explanation.
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin fails to improve as revenue scales or reverses materially.
  • Cash burn accelerates despite positive adjusted EBITDA.
  • New customer wins remain immaterial and Walmart concentration does not decline over time.
  • Major deployment delays or customer acceptance issues recur.

REDUCE

  • A top customer materially cuts planned deployments or renegotiates economics unfavorably.
  • Two consecutive quarters show worsening project margins and negative FCF with no credible recovery path.
  • Backlog quality deteriorates through cancellations, deferrals or lower-value scope changes.
  • Management pursues capital-heavy commercialization structures that transfer too much customer financing risk to Symbotic.

EXIT / THESIS INVALIDATED

  • Core platform fails to prove economic value outside the anchor customer base.
  • Structural software/service economics fail to emerge and the company remains a low-return systems integrator.
  • Material accounting/control issues impair confidence in contract economics.
  • A superior automation architecture causes sustained share loss in high-throughput distribution centers.

Competitive notes

Symbotic's differentiation is system-level: dense storage, autonomous handling, perception, orchestration software and integration are sold as one operating architecture. AutoStore is stronger in modular cube-storage ecosystems; Ocado has deep grocery automation IP; Dematic/Swisslog/Honeywell offer broad traditional automation; newer players such as Exotec emphasize modular robotics.

The key question is whether Symbotic's platform produces better lifetime warehouse economics, not whether its robots are individually more advanced. Durable advantage would show up in customer ROI, repeat deployments, higher throughput per square foot, lower labor requirements and software/service pull-through.

Portfolio interaction: SYM would diversify PowerFund away from data-center capex and into physical AI, but it is much higher execution risk than ISRG or CGNX. It should therefore require a larger expected-return cushion and smaller initial sizing.

Next diligence

  1. Build a customer-concentration bridge from FY2025 through FY2026 and quantify Walmart-related revenue/backlog exposure.
  2. Reconcile adjusted EBITDA to operating cash flow and FCF by quarter; isolate working-capital swings from true deployment economics.
  3. Track deployed systems, systems in implementation, backlog conversion time and customer acceptance milestones.
  4. Separate hardware/project gross margin from software/service economics where disclosures permit.
  5. Map GreenBox and other commercialization structures, including capital commitments, ownership and return profile.
  6. Compare warehouse ROI and deployment speed against AutoStore, Ocado, Dematic and Exotec.
  7. Refresh 24/60-month scenarios after Q4 FY2026; do not buy solely on revenue growth without evidence of diversification and cash conversion.

Next review: Q4 FY2026 results or any major customer/deployment announcement.