Price

Daily adjusted close · last point is delayed last sale · drag the brush to zoom

1D+0.5%
1W-1.6%
1M+14.4%
3M+8.3%
6M+114.5%
YTD+178.9%
1Y+85.5%
2Y—
Statusinvestigate
Researchprimary verified
Market cap$63.15B
Updated8/30/2026
Revenue (qtr)$582.3M
FCF (qtr)$-3.41B
Capex (qtr)$5.66B
Net debt$2.13B

Summary

Research status: Primary-source verified through the 24 August 2026 financing close; entry/add diligence refreshed 30 August 2026 using the $209.18 close on 28 August 2026.

Nebius continues to show extraordinary AI-cloud growth, but financing and per-share economics remain the central underwriting issue. Q2 group revenue rose 454% to $582.3M; AI-cloud revenue rose 514% to $575M; AI-cloud ARR reached $3.0B and adjusted EBITDA margin was about 50%. Management reaffirmed $3.0–3.4B 2026 revenue, $7–9B year-end ARR and about 40% adjusted EBITDA margin.

The August financing closed at $5.75B gross principal: $3.45B of 0.50% notes due 2030 and $2.30B of 4.50% notes due 2034. Expected net proceeds were about $5.68B. Separately, $800M of older converts are being exchanged for approximately 15.8M Class A shares. The financing materially reduces near-term funding risk for contracted capacity, but increases gross debt claims, coupon/accretion burden and dilution complexity.

At the current $209.18 price, the existing PowerFund scenario values imply approximately 39.8% annualized probability-weighted return over 24 months and 25.0% annualized over five years, but the bear case remains extremely severe at about -64%. The large modeled upside does not by itself justify adding because the scenario dispersion is dominated by whether the newly raised capital creates value per share after dilution, coupons, principal accretion and replacement capex.

Diligence conclusion: hold the current small starter; do not add yet. Require actual post-financing balance-sheet/share-count disclosure and evidence that newly financed capacity converts into signed revenue, EBITDA and cash at attractive per-share returns before increasing exposure.

Primary/company-sourced disclosures verified through 24 August 2026:

Valuation reference: $219.13 close on 21 August 2026 from PowerFund market data; price data is stale for Monday 24 August and must be refreshed before a transaction decision.

All scenario assumptions, probabilities, implied values, dilution estimates and financing interpretations are PowerFund calculations, not company guidance.

Thesis

Investment case

Nebius is building a full-stack AI cloud spanning GPU infrastructure, orchestration, training and inference, with additional optionality from Avride, TripleTen and strategic investments. Demand for scarce AI capacity is being converted into large signed agreements, customer prepayments and attractive management-reported payback periods. A mix of owned, colocated and asset-light capacity may allow the platform to scale faster than traditional clouds.

> The PowerFund thesis is that Nebius can become a large, profitable specialist AI cloud rather than a leveraged commodity GPU lessor. The thesis only works per share if contracted capacity converts into revenue and cash at attractive returns while financing, dilution, depreciation and replacement capex do not consume the value created.

Verified operating baseline

  • Q2 group revenue: $582.3M, +454%; AI-cloud revenue $575M, +514%.
  • AI-cloud ARR: $3.0B, +56% sequentially; AI cloud was approximately 98% of group revenue.
  • AI-cloud adjusted EBITDA: approximately $285.7M, margin 49.7%; group adjusted EBITDA $236.2M.
  • Four Q2 cloud agreements averaged >$1B TCV and roughly $20–25M annual contract value per MW.
  • Approximately 70% of Q2 deals included prepayments covering 50–60% of associated capex; management estimated ~1 year 10 months payback for those deals.
  • 2026 guidance: $3.0–3.4B revenue, $7–9B year-end ARR, ~40% adjusted EBITDA margin, $20–25B capex.
  • Q2 capex: approximately $5.7B; management expects >$9B customer prepayments during 2026.
  • 30 June balance sheet: $8.04B cash, ~$8.55B current/non-current debt, plus restricted cash; shares outstanding 271.86M.
  • Through 30 June, Nebius sold 12.7M shares through its ATM at weighted average $223.60, raising about $2.8B.
  • Management raised year-end 2026 contracted-power target to 5 GW and plans to deploy >1 GW per year from 2027.

August 2026 financing — final settlement economics

The financing closed on 24 August 2026 with full exercise of both purchaser options:

  • 2030 Notes: $3.45B original principal, 0.50% coupon, initial conversion price ~$313.46.
  • 2034 Notes: $2.30B original principal, 4.50% coupon, initial conversion price ~$324.65.
  • Total new original principal: $5.75B.
  • Expected net proceeds with full option exercise: approximately $5.68B.
  • Annual cash coupon on the new notes: approximately $120.8M before any conversions/redemptions.
  • The 2030 notes accrete to 110% of original principal at maturity and the 2034 notes to 125%, adding roughly $920M of aggregate principal accretion if held to maturity.
  • $800M of older 2029/2031 notes are exchanged for ~15.8M Class A shares, removing roughly $20M/year of old cash coupons while increasing basic shares.
  • Pro-forma basic shares after the announced exchange are roughly 287.7M using the 30 June share count, before subsequent ATM/SBC activity.
  • At initial conversion rates, the new August notes represent approximately 18.1M shares of potential stock settlement, or ~6.3% of that pro-forma basic share count, before make-whole adjustments. Actual dilution depends on stock price and settlement method.

The financing should not be judged as automatically dilutive or accretive. Initially it adds cash roughly alongside debt, so the key economic question is what return Nebius earns on the $5.68B net proceeds relative to coupon/accretion, future dilution and replacement capex.

KPI ladder

KPIHealthy / thesis-supportiveWarning
ARR growth>25% sequential during ramp<25% before 2027 build substantially delivered
AI-cloud adj. EBITDA margin≥40%<40%; serious if <30% twice
Customer prepayment / associated capex~50%+<35% on major new deals
Capacity deliveryon time / <1 quarter slip>1 quarter repeated slips
Net financing / ARR createdimprovingfinancing grows faster than durable ARR/EBITDA
Basic + diluted share growthvalue-accretive>5–10% without higher base-case value/share
Revenue / MW~$20–25M ACV/MW on large dealsstructural deterioration
Cash conversionimproves with scaleadjusted EBITDA without economic FCF

PowerFund valuation scenarios

Reference: $219.13 close on 21 August 2026. This mark is stale for 24 August and must be refreshed before a buy/add decision. The scenario values below remain broad PowerFund estimates, not company guidance; they already assume substantial future dilution and case-specific net debt, so the full exercise of the $750M option changes funding certainty more than the broad valuation range.

24 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied value
Bear35%$9B revenue; 25% EBITDA margin; 12x EV/EBITDA; $3B net debt; ~320M shares$75
Base45%$18B revenue; 40% margin; 18x; $2B net debt; ~310M shares$412
Bull20%$28B revenue; 48% margin; 22x; near-zero net debt; ~300M shares$986

Probability-weighted working value: approximately $409/share. Against the stale $219.13 reference, that implies very high modeled upside, but the dispersion is extreme and the financing/capacity conversion still needs proof.

60 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied value
Bear35%$14B revenue; 30% margin; 8x; $2B net debt; ~340M shares$93
Base45%$35B revenue; 42% margin; 14x; near-zero net debt; ~330M shares$624
Bull20%$60B revenue; 48% margin; 18x; near-zero net debt; ~320M shares$1,620

The wide range matters more than the weighted value. Financing now provides more runway to reach the upside cases, but also raises the hurdle for proving per-share value creation.

Catalysts

  • Delivery of $7–9B year-end 2026 ARR and approximately 40% adjusted EBITDA margin.
  • Late-2026 capacity for the four large Q2 agreements coming online on schedule and contributing primarily to 2027 revenue.
  • Collection of more than $9B of expected 2026 customer prepayments and maintenance of 50–60% capex coverage on new deals.
  • Execution of the 5 GW contracted-power pipeline and deployment of more than 1 GW annually from 2027.
  • Asset-backed and asset-light financing reducing the need for corporate debt and equity dilution.
  • Diversification beyond the largest strategic customers and continued premium pricing for short-duration capacity.
  • Token Factory/inference and full-stack software increasing utilisation, customer retention and value beyond GPU rental.
  • Transparent evidence that Avride and strategic equity stakes create per-share value without distracting capital from the cloud.

Risks

  • Extreme capital intensity: Q2 capex was approximately $5.7B and 2026 capex guidance is $20–25B.
  • Financing stack materially larger: the August deal closed at $5.75B, not $5.0B, after full exercise of the $750M purchaser options.
  • Coupon/accretion burden: annual cash coupons on the new notes are about $120.8M; stated principal accretion could add roughly $920M by maturity if the notes remain outstanding.
  • Conversion/dilution complexity: initial conversion prices are ~$313.46 and ~$324.65; the two new series correspond to ~18.1M shares at the initial conversion rates if fully stock-settled, before make-whole adjustments.
  • Existing-note exchange: $800M of older converts are exchanged for ~15.8M Class A shares, roughly 5.8% of the 30 June basic share count, though much of their economic dilution was already embedded in the old converts.
  • Full financing stack is complex: March converts, secured debt, customer prepayments, ATM shares, August converts, leases and asset-light arrangements must be assessed together.
  • Customer concentration and execution: several large contracts make deployment delays, renegotiations or utilisation misses material.
  • Scarcity pricing: current AI-cloud margins and revenue/MW economics may normalise as supply grows.
  • Adjusted economics: depreciation, SBC, interest, principal accretion and replacement capex remain weaker than headline adjusted EBITDA.
  • Technology obsolescence: GPUs/networking equipment can lose economic value quickly.
  • Valuation: large modeled upside does not justify adding without current price data and proof that incremental financing increases value per share.

Invalidation

Warning — investigate and freeze additions

  • Quarterly ARR growth falls below approximately 25% sequentially before the 2027 capacity ramp is substantially delivered.
  • AI-cloud adjusted EBITDA margin falls below 40%, or capex rises without proportional signed ACV/prepayment support.
  • Major capacity milestones slip by more than one quarter or connected capacity materially trails guidance.
  • Equity dilution exceeds approximately 5% over 12 months without a demonstrable increase in per-share base-case value.
  • EV/forward ARR exceeds approximately 12x while ARR guidance and contract economics stop improving.

Reduce — normally trim 25–50%

  • Year-end ARR or revenue guidance is cut by more than 15%.
  • AI-cloud adjusted EBITDA margin remains below 30% for two quarters.
  • Prepayments cover less than approximately 35% of associated capex on new large agreements, increasing funding dependence.
  • A major customer delays, renegotiates or cancels contracted capacity, or customer commitments prove materially less binding than assumed.
  • Net debt, convertibles and dilution grow faster than enterprise value created per share.
  • Utilisation or pricing for commissioned capacity weakens while competing supply comes online.

Invalidate — exit unless a documented exception is approved

  • Contracted capacity repeatedly fails to convert into connected, revenue-producing infrastructure.
  • Large customer losses or renegotiations reduce normalised revenue/EBITDA power by more than 20%.
  • The AI-cloud operation becomes adjusted-EBITDA negative after the current ramp or cannot fund maintenance/replacement capex through a cycle.
  • Capital markets, customer prepayments or asset-backed finance become unavailable on economic terms, preventing contracted delivery.
  • Evidence shows the business is primarily a commodity GPU lessor with no durable software, utilisation or cost advantage.
  • Governance, disclosure or accounting concerns make customer commitments, margins, capex economics or per-share dilution unreliable.

Competitive notes

Nebius competes with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud at the platform level and with CoreWeave, Oracle, Crusoe, Lambda and other specialist capacity providers. Its strengths are speed of deployment, a purpose-built AI software stack, access to current NVIDIA systems, flexible contracts and demonstrated ability to win large customers.

Its disadvantages are smaller scale, weaker diversification, greater financing dependence and less proven enterprise distribution than hyperscalers. The durable moat must come from orchestration software, utilisation, performance per dollar, customer integration and financing efficiency—not merely temporary GPU scarcity. The asset-light model could improve capital efficiency, but it remains early and must be measured separately from owned/colocated economics.

Next diligence

  1. Reconcile the full post-settlement financing stack from the next filing: March 2026 converts, July secured debt, August $5.75B converts, remaining older converts, customer prepayments, ATM equity, leases and asset-light financing.
  2. Confirm the settlement of the $800M old-note exchange into ~15.8M shares and reconcile the actual updated basic/diluted share count.
  3. Track deployment of the ~$5.68B net proceeds by GPUs, data centers, land/power, working capital and other uses.
  4. Tie each major financing source to contracted customer economics: TCV, prepayment, capex, MW, revenue start, expected EBITDA and payback.
  5. Track connected, commissioned and utilised MW plus revenue/EBITDA per MW by cohort.
  6. Recalculate scenarios after the next updated balance-sheet/share-count disclosure.

Position rule: hold current small starter; no add solely because the stock is down or because the financing closed. Addability requires evidence that incremental financing increases base-case value per share.

Reviews

Completed catalysts for this name. The full archive is on the Calendar past list.

  • Assess late-September PCE/GDP and deployment conditionsPrevious belief → new evidence → updated belief. Previous belief: after the 16 Sep FOMC, PowerFund was SLOW / SELECTIVE because the policy-rate path and real-yield hurdle had worsened, so correlated AI-infrastructure deployment required both fresh company evidence and greater valuation margin. New evidence: BEA's 30 Sep releases show August PCE prices +0.3% m/m and +3.4% y/y, core PCE +0.2% m/m and +3.0% y/y, while real PCE rose 0.6% m/m. Q2 real GDP was revised up to 2.2% annualized from 1.5%, with real final sales to private domestic purchasers +4.6%; consumer spending and investment were important contributors. Inflation is therefore improving at the margin, especially core monthly PCE, but demand/growth remain too firm to treat this as a clean rate-relief signal. Updated belief: MAINTAIN SLOW / SELECTIVE deployment rather than accelerate correlated AI-capex risk. The macro valuation hurdle has eased modestly but has not disappeared; price weakness alone remains insufficient for adds. Independent-factor opportunities remain eligible if their own evidence and valuation gates clear. No planned trade is created by this macro review. Sources: https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-august-2026 ; https://bea.gov/news/2026/gdp-third-estimate-industries-corporate-profits-state-gdp-and-state-personal-income-2nd
  • Review September FOMC and deployment stanceCompleted 17 Sep 2026 after the Sep 15–16 FOMC. The Fed unanimously raised the target range 25 bp to 3.75–4.00%, its first hike since 2023. The September SEP shifted materially hawkish versus June: median appropriate fed funds is 4.1% at end-2026 (vs 3.8% in June), 4.1% at end-2027 (vs 3.6%), 3.9% in 2028 and 3.6% in 2029; the longer-run median rose to 3.2%. Sixteen of 18 submitted rate paths call for at least one further hike in 2026. The macro mix is stronger growth/labor plus stickier inflation: 2026 GDP median 2.3% vs 2.2% in June, unemployment 4.1% vs 4.3%, PCE inflation 3.7% vs 3.6%, core PCE 3.4% vs 3.3%; 17 of 18 participants see PCE inflation risks tilted upside and 15 of 18 see core-PCE risks tilted upside. Chair Warsh emphasized that underlying inflation trends have not meaningfully improved and declined to give forward guidance. Financial conditions remain restrictive: Sep 16 2-year Treasury yield rose ~7.5 bp to 4.738%, 10-year reached ~5.00%; the latest 10-year TIPS real yield before the meeting was ~2.62% on Sep 15; the dollar index rose ~0.63%. Equities weakened but AI/tech showed some resilience: S&P 500 -0.44%, Nasdaq essentially flat and semiconductors +0.6%. The implementation framework continues ample reserves and full rollover/reinvestment, so the tightening impulse is principally the higher policy-rate path rather than renewed balance-sheet runoff. PowerFund conclusion: MAINTAIN A SLOW / SELECTIVE DEPLOYMENT STANCE; do not accelerate correlated AI Infrastructure deployment. The long-term AI-capex thesis remains intact—Fed itself describes capital investment as robust and the growth outlook strengthened—but the discount-rate/real-yield hurdle has worsened and the 10-year near 5% means valuation discipline must tighten. Existing thesis-intact holdings remain holds; NBIS remains strict no-add without contract/financing evidence; SNDK remains deferred. Do not average down solely because AI names have fallen. New AI adds require both fresh company-specific evidence and a re-ranked expected return that compensates for the higher cost of capital. VRT's drop into the ~$235–240 area is now economically interesting but should trigger a refreshed dossier/opportunity ranking rather than an automatic add, especially given UIG acquisition integration/capital-allocation risk and the recent sector-wide debate about AI buildout pacing. Independent Defence/Robotics/Energy opportunities remain eligible if they clear their own gates. The late-September PCE/GDP review remains the next scheduled macro deployment gate. No trade or planned action is created by this macro review alone.
  • Assess August inflation before September FOMCCompleted 15 Sep 2026 using the Aug PPI/CPI releases and post-CPI market reaction. Aug PPI rose 0.4% m/m and 5.4% y/y; final-demand goods rose 1.1%, services 0.1%, and final demand less food, energy and trade services rose 0.3% m/m. Aug CPI rose 0.4% m/m and 3.4% y/y; core CPI accelerated to 0.3% m/m while easing only to 2.4% y/y. Shelter rose 0.3% m/m, services less energy services rose 0.3% m/m, transportation services 0.5%, and gasoline 3.9%. The print therefore did not meet the pre-release benign threshold needed to clear the rate/valuation gate. Market confirmation strengthened that conclusion: September Fed hike odds rose from roughly 72% before CPI to near 90% after the release; the 10-year Treasury subsequently crossed 5% on 14 Sep, while the dollar strengthened and oil remained above $100/bbl. Equities initially rallied on 11 Sep as oil eased, showing no immediate fundamental break in AI demand, but the broader discount-rate backdrop worsened and AI/tech remained vulnerable to valuation and factor pressure. PowerFund conclusion: SLOW new correlated AI Infrastructure deployment into the FOMC rather than accelerate. Keep existing thesis-intact holdings; do not average down solely because prices have fallen; require company-specific evidence and valuation margin for adds. NBIS remains no-add without contract/financing evidence. With cash ~90% of NAV there is no need to force deployment ahead of the 16 Sep FOMC. This review does not change the long-term AI-capex thesis; it raises the near-term cost-of-capital hurdle. The September FOMC review is the next macro deployment gate. No trade is created by this review alone.
  • Assess August jobs report and AI valuation pressureCompleted 5 Sep 2026 using the 4 Sep August Employment Situation and market reaction. Payrolls rose 162k versus ~56k expected; June was revised +11k to +31k and July +44k from -23k to +21k, lifting the two-month total by 55k. Unemployment held at 4.1%; participation edged up to 61.6%; the workweek rose 0.1 hour to 34.4. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% m/m and 3.1% y/y, the latter easing from July and limiting the wage-inflation signal. Markets nevertheless treated the report as reducing near-term rate relief: the 2-year Treasury yield rose roughly 4–5 bp to ~4.37–4.38% after briefly reaching ~4.42%; the 10-year finished near 4.78%; the dollar index rose ~0.2%; S&P 500 fell 0.38% and Nasdaq 0.29%. September Fed hike odds rose intraday into the ~60% area before easing somewhat. PowerFund conclusion: labor resilience is positive for end-demand and does not weaken the AI-capex thesis, but it raises the discount-rate hurdle and leaves CPI/PPI as the decisive near-term macro gate. Maintain, do not accelerate, AI Infrastructure deployment. Existing positions remain unchanged; do not chase rebounds; keep SNDK deferred and require company-specific valuation/fundamental evidence for any adds. The already-scheduled Aug CPI/PPI review remains the next macro decision gate.
  • Assess AI/semi correction after Jackson HoleCompleted after Jackson Hole 2026 and the Aug. 28 market reaction. Chair Kevin Warsh said the 2% PCE target is firm and that the Fed must be confident underlying inflation is moving clearly and sufficiently quickly toward target or 'we have work to do.' He described labor markets as stable, output as solid, AI-related capex as a major driver of investment, and medium-term inflation expectations as broadly anchored, but emphasized that inflation remains too high and avoided dovish forward guidance. Markets interpreted the speech as hawkish: rate-hike expectations increased and U.S. equities finished lower. Conclusion for PowerFund: the AI/semiconductor fundamental demand thesis is strengthening, but the valuation/rates headwind has not cleared. Maintain—not accelerate—AI Infrastructure deployment. Keep existing CLS, VRT, NVT and NBIS positions at current sizing; no averaging down in NBIS without contract-level evidence. Favor selective entries/adds only when company-specific evidence is strong and valuation offers a margin of safety. CRDO remains gated to its own earnings; ANET/NVDA remain high-quality but valuation-sensitive. The current AI Infrastructure sleeve is only ~5.6% of NAV and cash is ~92%, so there is ample capacity to deploy later without forcing purchases into a still-hawkish rates backdrop.
  • Review NVIDIA Q2 FY27 earnings and reassess AI deploymentNVIDIA Q2 FY27 materially supports the view that the recent AI/semi selloff has been driven primarily by factor/valuation compression rather than a break in AI infrastructure fundamentals. Q2 revenue was $96.2B (+106% YoY, +18% QoQ), Data Center revenue $89.0B (+117% YoY, +18% QoQ), and Q3 revenue guidance is $108B ±2% despite assuming no Data Center compute revenue from China. Vera Rubin is now in full production, with racks running at CoreWeave, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure and Nebius; Spectrum-6 systems are arriving at gigascale AI factories. These points reinforce ongoing demand for compute, networking, power/cooling and data-center systems relevant to VRT, NVT, CLS, ANET, CRDO and NBIS. The principal caution is valuation/expectation risk: Q3 gross margin is guided to 74.0% ±50bp versus 75.0% in Q2, while investors remain sensitive to the sustainability and financing of AI capex. NVIDIA also announced financing partnerships intended to mobilize >$500B of third-party capital, which supports buildout capacity but increases the need to distinguish genuine end-demand from financing-supported expansion. Portfolio conclusion: lift the temporary blanket pause on correlated AI/semi deployment that was imposed pending NVIDIA, but do not mechanically average down. AI/semi names are again eligible for normal opportunity ranking and the pre-buy integrity gate; CRDO remains gated until after its 1 September earnings, NBIS remains not addable pending post-financing per-share analysis, and any SNDK/VRT/NVT/CLS action still requires current prices plus company-specific evidence. Existing holdings remain HOLD; no individual thesis invalidation or trim signal is triggered by NVIDIA's results.
  • Assess PCE/GDP reaction before NVIDIAJuly PCE/Q2 GDP review completed before NVIDIA earnings. Inflation was modestly hotter/stickier than ideal and Treasury yields remained elevated, raising the discount-rate hurdle for valuation-sensitive AI Infrastructure. However, the equity reaction was contained and there was no macro evidence that the underlying AI-capex cycle had weakened. Maintain the temporary pause on new correlated AI/semi deployment until NVIDIA provides the fundamental demand read-through; independent Defence, Energy, and Robotics/AI opportunities remain eligible. No portfolio decision change was required from this macro review alone.
  • Review NBIS financing settlement and dilution impactNebius's August financing closed on 24 August 2026 at $5.75B gross principal after full exercise of purchaser options. The event materially improves liquidity/funding certainty for contracted AI-cloud capacity but also increases gross debt, coupon/accretion burden, and dilution complexity. Dossier updated to v4 with final terms, pro-forma share/dilution analysis, and refreshed next diligence. Investment stance is unchanged: maintain the existing small high-beta position; do not add solely because the financing closed. Reassess addability only after the full post-settlement financing stack, actual updated share count, and capacity-to-revenue economics are reconciled.