Investment case
Nebius is building a full-stack AI cloud spanning GPU infrastructure, orchestration, training and inference, with additional optionality from Avride, TripleTen and strategic investments. Demand for scarce AI capacity is being converted into large signed agreements, customer prepayments and attractive management-reported payback periods. A mix of owned, colocated and asset-light capacity may allow the platform to scale faster than traditional clouds.
> The PowerFund thesis is that Nebius can become a large, profitable specialist AI cloud rather than a leveraged commodity GPU lessor. The thesis only works per share if contracted capacity converts into revenue and cash at attractive returns while financing, dilution, depreciation and replacement capex do not consume the value created.
Verified operating baseline
- Q2 group revenue: $582.3M, +454%; AI-cloud revenue $575M, +514%.
- AI-cloud ARR: $3.0B, +56% sequentially; AI cloud was approximately 98% of group revenue.
- AI-cloud adjusted EBITDA: approximately $285.7M, margin 49.7%; group adjusted EBITDA $236.2M.
- Four Q2 cloud agreements averaged >$1B TCV and roughly $20–25M annual contract value per MW.
- Approximately 70% of Q2 deals included prepayments covering 50–60% of associated capex; management estimated ~1 year 10 months payback for those deals.
- 2026 guidance: $3.0–3.4B revenue, $7–9B year-end ARR, ~40% adjusted EBITDA margin, $20–25B capex.
- Q2 capex: approximately $5.7B; management expects >$9B customer prepayments during 2026.
- 30 June balance sheet: $8.04B cash, ~$8.55B current/non-current debt, plus restricted cash; shares outstanding 271.86M.
- Through 30 June, Nebius sold 12.7M shares through its ATM at weighted average $223.60, raising about $2.8B.
- Management raised year-end 2026 contracted-power target to 5 GW and plans to deploy >1 GW per year from 2027.
August 2026 financing — final settlement economics
The financing closed on 24 August 2026 with full exercise of both purchaser options:
- 2030 Notes: $3.45B original principal, 0.50% coupon, initial conversion price ~$313.46.
- 2034 Notes: $2.30B original principal, 4.50% coupon, initial conversion price ~$324.65.
- Total new original principal: $5.75B.
- Expected net proceeds with full option exercise: approximately $5.68B.
- Annual cash coupon on the new notes: approximately $120.8M before any conversions/redemptions.
- The 2030 notes accrete to 110% of original principal at maturity and the 2034 notes to 125%, adding roughly $920M of aggregate principal accretion if held to maturity.
- $800M of older 2029/2031 notes are exchanged for ~15.8M Class A shares, removing roughly $20M/year of old cash coupons while increasing basic shares.
- Pro-forma basic shares after the announced exchange are roughly 287.7M using the 30 June share count, before subsequent ATM/SBC activity.
- At initial conversion rates, the new August notes represent approximately 18.1M shares of potential stock settlement, or ~6.3% of that pro-forma basic share count, before make-whole adjustments. Actual dilution depends on stock price and settlement method.
The financing should not be judged as automatically dilutive or accretive. Initially it adds cash roughly alongside debt, so the key economic question is what return Nebius earns on the $5.68B net proceeds relative to coupon/accretion, future dilution and replacement capex.
KPI ladder
| KPI | Healthy / thesis-supportive | Warning |
|---|
| ARR growth | >25% sequential during ramp | <25% before 2027 build substantially delivered |
| AI-cloud adj. EBITDA margin | ≥40% | <40%; serious if <30% twice |
| Customer prepayment / associated capex | ~50%+ | <35% on major new deals |
| Capacity delivery | on time / <1 quarter slip | >1 quarter repeated slips |
| Net financing / ARR created | improving | financing grows faster than durable ARR/EBITDA |
| Basic + diluted share growth | value-accretive | >5–10% without higher base-case value/share |
| Revenue / MW | ~$20–25M ACV/MW on large deals | structural deterioration |
| Cash conversion | improves with scale | adjusted EBITDA without economic FCF |
PowerFund valuation scenarios
Reference: $219.13 close on 21 August 2026. This mark is stale for 24 August and must be refreshed before a buy/add decision. The scenario values below remain broad PowerFund estimates, not company guidance; they already assume substantial future dilution and case-specific net debt, so the full exercise of the $750M option changes funding certainty more than the broad valuation range.
24 months
| Case | Weight | Core assumptions | Implied value |
|---|
| Bear | 35% | $9B revenue; 25% EBITDA margin; 12x EV/EBITDA; $3B net debt; ~320M shares | $75 |
| Base | 45% | $18B revenue; 40% margin; 18x; $2B net debt; ~310M shares | $412 |
| Bull | 20% | $28B revenue; 48% margin; 22x; near-zero net debt; ~300M shares | $986 |
Probability-weighted working value: approximately $409/share. Against the stale $219.13 reference, that implies very high modeled upside, but the dispersion is extreme and the financing/capacity conversion still needs proof.
60 months
| Case | Weight | Core assumptions | Implied value |
|---|
| Bear | 35% | $14B revenue; 30% margin; 8x; $2B net debt; ~340M shares | $93 |
| Base | 45% | $35B revenue; 42% margin; 14x; near-zero net debt; ~330M shares | $624 |
| Bull | 20% | $60B revenue; 48% margin; 18x; near-zero net debt; ~320M shares | $1,620 |
The wide range matters more than the weighted value. Financing now provides more runway to reach the upside cases, but also raises the hurdle for proving per-share value creation.