Price

Daily adjusted close · last point is delayed last sale · drag the brush to zoom

1D+0.8%
1W-1.9%
1M-10.4%
3M-10.5%
6M-23.3%
YTD-5.6%
1Y+2.8%
2Y+75.4%
Statusinvestigate
Researchprimary verified
Market cap$37.32B
Updated8/15/2026
Revenue (qtr)$813.8M
FCF (qtr)$24.5M
Capex (qtr)$106.5M
Net debt$-116.0M

Summary

Research status: Primary-source verified through Q2 2026. Valuation basis: US$97.74 closing price on 14 August 2026; operating figures are in Canadian dollars unless stated otherwise.

Cameco provides the most direct new factor exposure in the group: uranium contracting, fuel services and a 49% interest in Westinghouse. First-half uranium adjusted EBITDA rose 5% to C$676M, 2026 consolidated revenue guidance increased to C$3.32–3.57B, and the uranium realized-price outlook increased to C$91–96/lb. However, Q2 showed the volatility behind the theme: uranium sales volume fell 18%, gross profit fell 27%, purchased pounds were materially more expensive than produced pounds, and Cameco's share of Westinghouse adjusted EBITDA fell 54% year over year. The long-term nuclear thesis is credible, but the current US$42.5B market value prices substantial success. Keep CCJ to a small discovery position and require either a better entry or stronger contract/production evidence before scaling.

Primary sources verified through 15 August 2026:

All 24/60-month scenario assumptions, probabilities and implied values are PowerFund calculations, not company guidance or analyst consensus.

Thesis

Investment case

Cameco combines tier-one uranium production in stable jurisdictions, conversion and fuel services, long-term utility contracts, and a 49% interest in Westinghouse. This creates exposure across the nuclear fuel cycle rather than to spot uranium alone. Contract discipline can preserve uncommitted resources for better pricing, while Westinghouse adds a large installed reactor service and fuel base plus new-build optionality.

The variant perception is that security-of-supply concerns, utility contracting and new reactor demand will sustain stronger uranium and fuel-cycle economics for longer than prior cycles. The counterpoint is that the stock already reflects a powerful nuclear renaissance, while realized prices can lag spot markets, production is operationally concentrated, and Westinghouse new-build work is capital- and execution-intensive.

Verified operating baseline

  • First-half 2026 uranium adjusted EBITDA: C$676M, up 5%; Q2 uranium adjusted EBITDA was C$252M, down 28% because of delivery timing and lower planned volumes.
  • Q2 uranium sales volume: 7.1M lb, down 18%; average realized price: C$93.13/lb, up 15%.
  • Q2 uranium gross profit: C$158M, down 27%; unit cost of sales rose 26% to C$70.81/lb.
  • 2026 outlook: 19.5–21.5M lb owned uranium production, 29–32M lb sales, and consolidated revenue of C$3.32–3.57B.
  • 2026 uranium realized-price outlook: C$91–96/lb; uranium revenue outlook: C$2.70–2.91B.
  • Cameco's share of Westinghouse Q2 adjusted EBITDA: C$163M, down 54%; 2026 company outlook for its share remains US$370–430M.
  • At Q2, cash and short-term investments were approximately C$1.11B, debt C$1.00B, and net cash approximately C$116M.
  • At year-end 2025, uranium long-term commitments totaled about 230M lb, averaging approximately 28M lb annually over the following five years; fuel-services contracted volume was about 83M kgU of UF6.

Valuation scenarios

PowerFund share-price scenarios based on US$97.74 on 14 August 2026. Direct share values are used because CCJ combines Canadian-dollar mining/fuel economics and equity-accounted Westinghouse earnings; dividends are excluded.

24 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied valueReturn / CAGR
Bear25%Uranium retreats below US$65/lb; production and Westinghouse miss; multiple compresses$65-33.5% / -18.5%
Base50%Uranium holds roughly US$90–110/lb; contracts reprice and operations meet plan$115+17.7% / +8.5%
Bull25%Uranium exceeds US$120/lb; supply stays tight and AP1000/new-build work advances$160+63.7% / +27.9%

Probability-weighted working value: approximately $114, or 7.9% annualised.

60 months

CaseWeightCore assumptionsImplied valueReturn / CAGR
Bear25%Supply responds; uranium normalizes to US$60–70/lb; project setbacks persist$60-38.6% / -9.3%
Base50%Contracting supports attractive realized prices; fuel services and Westinghouse compound$145+48.4% / +8.2%
Bull25%Durable Western supply deficit plus successful reactor build cycle$230+135.3% / +18.7%

Probability-weighted working value: approximately $145, or 8.2% annualised. At today's price, CCJ is more useful as a small factor diversifier and asymmetric nuclear option than as a large base-case return engine.

Catalysts

  • New long-term uranium and conversion contracts at prices and terms that improve portfolio realized-price sensitivity.
  • Owned production meeting the 19.5–21.5M lb outlook with lower reliance on high-cost market purchases.
  • Cigar Lake and McArthur River/Key Lake operating reliably after maintenance or third-party processing disruptions.
  • Uranium realized prices moving toward or above the C$91–96/lb outlook while unit costs normalize.
  • Westinghouse delivering the US$370–430M 2026 adjusted-EBITDA range for Cameco's share.
  • Definitive U.S. AP1000 agreements, additional international new-build awards, or higher-margin fuel/service contracts.
  • Distributions from Westinghouse and JV Inkai converting equity earnings into parent cash.

Risks

  • Valuation: the current market value embeds a strong uranium price, successful contracting and meaningful Westinghouse growth.
  • Commodity cycle: uranium prices and contracting can reverse as supply, inventories, enrichment or policy conditions change.
  • Operational concentration: Cigar Lake, McArthur River/Key Lake and third-party mills create outage and logistics risk.
  • Cost mismatch: market purchases and product loans can cost substantially more than internally produced pounds.
  • Contract structure: ceilings and delivery timing can cause realized prices and cash flow to lag spot-market enthusiasm.
  • Kazakhstan exposure: JV Inkai production, transport, dividends and regulation add geopolitical and timing risk.
  • Westinghouse execution: new-build projects require financing, partners, permits and disciplined project delivery; equity earnings do not equal parent cash.
  • Currency and regulation: U.S.-dollar sales, Canadian-dollar costs, environmental obligations, tax disputes and nuclear policy affect results.

Invalidation

Warning — investigate and freeze additions

  • Owned production tracks below the 19.5M lb low end or unit cost of sales remains above C$70/lb without a temporary maintenance explanation.
  • Contracting slows, realized-price sensitivity deteriorates, or market purchases exceed plan without offsetting economics.
  • Westinghouse's expected 2026 contribution moves below US$370M adjusted EBITDA for Cameco's share.
  • The share price rises faster than uranium contract prices and cash-flow revisions, expanding the valuation disconnect.

Reduce — normally trim 25–50%

  • Uranium production, sales-volume or realized-price guidance is reduced by more than 10%.
  • A core operation suffers an outage that materially impairs twelve-month delivery coverage or forces uneconomic replacement purchases.
  • Uranium gross margin remains below 20% for two quarters despite supportive market prices.
  • Westinghouse misses its annual adjusted-EBITDA range by more than 15% or consumes material incremental owner capital.
  • Net debt rises materially to fund operating shortfalls, acquisitions or new-build exposure rather than value-accretive capacity.

Invalidate — exit unless a documented exception is approved

  • A multi-year impairment or loss of a tier-one uranium asset prevents Cameco from meeting contract commitments economically.
  • Contract discipline breaks: long-duration volumes are committed at terms that destroy upside or require structurally loss-making purchases.
  • Westinghouse experiences a major project loss, regulatory failure or capital requirement that materially impairs Cameco's investment.
  • Nuclear policy, reactor closures and utility contracting enter a structural multi-year reversal rather than a cyclical pause.
  • Accounting, reserve, environmental, tax or joint-venture evidence makes reported asset value or cash conversion unreliable.

Competitive notes

Cameco's advantage is the combination of large, high-grade Canadian resources, licensed conversion/fuel capability, a long utility contracting history, and Westinghouse's reactor-service and fuel footprint. Few public companies provide comparable exposure across uranium, conversion, fabrication, services and reactor technology.

Competition and customer alternatives still matter. Kazatomprom is the largest low-cost uranium producer, Orano spans mining and fuel-cycle services, and utilities can use inventories, secondary supplies and alternative contract structures. Cameco's scarcity value is real, but commodity economics and customer bargaining power remain; the company should not be valued as a monopoly or as a simple proxy for spot uranium.

Next diligence

  1. Build a five-year contract-delivery model showing base-escalated versus market-related pricing, ceilings/floors and annual volume ranges.
  2. Reconcile owned production, Inkai purchases, market purchases, product loans, inventory and deliveries by quarter.
  3. Track Cigar Lake and McArthur River/Key Lake production, unit costs, maintenance and third-party processing constraints.
  4. Separate Westinghouse core services/fuel EBITDA from new-build milestones; track distributions, capex and owner funding.
  5. Stress-test CCJ at uranium prices of US$60, $80, $100 and $130/lb with Canadian-dollar and purchase-cost sensitivities.
  6. Refresh scenarios after Q3 2026 and every material contracting, production or AP1000 update; keep discovery sizing until the base-case return clears PowerFund's hurdle.

Next scheduled review: Q3 2026 results; earlier following a production outage, major contract, Westinghouse funding request or uranium-price dislocation.